← Search

Eric Salter

Dayton, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 34W–50L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eric Salter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-07-18 · STC-Ritze · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · STC-Ritze · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Stankas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-19 · STC-Ritze · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · STC-Ritze · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · STC-Ritze · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ed Honore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · STC-Ritze · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Ritze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · STC-Ritze · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-08 · STC-Ritze · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Workman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-02-15 · QRRC-Taylor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Somerset
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-10 · STC Ritze · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Ritze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-12-06 · STC Ritze · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-08 · QRRC Taylor · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59%
23W–16L · 53% of games
4.0
12.5%
4W–28L · 35.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 23% of the time
#2 Doubles
23%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#2 Singles
18%
15 matches
#1 Singles
16%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer