← Search

Jeffrey Nabholz

Oakwood, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 45W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Nabholz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-04-26 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · QRRC-Dowse · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-22 · QRRC-Dowse · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · QRRC-Dowse · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Tae Kim
2026-03-07 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-28 · QRRC-Dowse · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-15 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · QRRC-Johannes · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-17 · QRRC-Dowse · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
62.3%
38W–23L · 59.4% of games
4.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 42.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 43% of the time
#2 Singles
43%
39 matches
#1 Singles
29%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams