← Search

Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr

Fairborn, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 44W–55L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Frank BUDDY Pitts Jr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-07-11 · QRRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rodolfo Aguilera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · QRRC-Webb · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Petsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-23 · QRRC-Webb · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · QRRC-Rittwage · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Miranda Riggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · QRRC-Wenz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with AYESHA CURE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · KTC-Goel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-07 · QRRC-Wenz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
Joseph Graham / David Klump
2026-02-15 · QRRC-Wenz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Arentsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with AYESHA CURE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-02-01 · QRRC-Wenz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Thielen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maggie Leadman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.8% of games
3.5
42.9%
15W–20L · 43.6% of games
4.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 38.9% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#2 Singles
12%
12 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams