← Search

Kim Janes

— year-end
170 matches · 95W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Janes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-06-22 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marie Parkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Binns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · Baker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Binns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · Baker · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melanie Pratt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-09-30 · #3 Doubles · with Eli Griffin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2023-09-29 · #3 Doubles · with Bonnie Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
Lena Grotz / Deborah Davis
2023-09-29 · #2 Doubles · with Bonnie Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2023-09-06 · #3 Doubles · with Bonnie Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-08-29 · Boozer 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eli Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2023-08-26 · Boozer 65 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jinny Boozer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
84.4%
38W–7L · 65.9% of games
3.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 42.3% of games
6.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 56.4% of games
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 44.4% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 53.4% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–9L · 34% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#2 Singles
15%
25 matches
#1 Singles
14%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova