← Search

Anita Gibson

Pocatello, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
280 matches · 146W–134L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anita Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history280 matches
L
2026-08-13 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Paulsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-11 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Lurline Berry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Diane Poole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Diane Poole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Diane Poole championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Lurline Berry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Middle Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Victoria Scharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Middle Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Venita Petti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-08 · Fun In The Sun · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Goode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · We Still Got IT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
65.3%
66W–35L · 57.1% of games
3.5
18.8%
9W–39L · 39.6% of games
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 73.5% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
52.2%
35W–32L · 51.2% of games
6.5mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
101 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
75 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer