← Search

Aimee Rathburn

Shelley, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 58W–102L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Aimee Rathburn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-08-20 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-20 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-19 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lori Head
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-03 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marie Parkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Barbara Baker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Barbara Baker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-20 · Barbara Baker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Rindfleisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Rathburn · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rebecca Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · Rathburn · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-15 · Rathburn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sonja Facer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · Rathburn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · Rathburn · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Keefe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 56.3% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
21W–21L · 51.8% of games
7.0
27.3%
9W–24L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
23.5%
8W–26L · 43.1% of games
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King