← Search

Nicole Simpson

Erieville, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 58W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nicole Simpson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Matt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Matt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danilo Fernando mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Syracuse: Simpson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · SFTC - Wallenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danilo Fernando mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alysia Schmaltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Syracuse: Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Matt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ainslie Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · Syracuse: Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Matt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · Syracuse: Simpson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lizzie Barlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-16 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Pitts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-16 · #2 Doubles · with Jill Pitts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
66.7%
36W–18L · 53.9% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 38% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King