← Search

Craig Nicholls

Syracuse, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 40W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Craig Nicholls to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-07-11 · Bradley 55+ 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-07-11 · Bradley 55+ 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ezika Unobagha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · Bradley 55+ 9.0 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ben Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · 40-LOVE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kurran Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-12 · 40-LOVE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Leopold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · 40-LOVE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Leopold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-03-25 · Bradley A · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Brian Emigholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-11 · Bradley A · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Jon Westfall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-01 · 40-LOVE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-01-28 · Bradley A · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Jackson Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · 40-LOVE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Hann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-17 · Bradley A · #2 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Brian Emigholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 55.1% of games
4.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 58.7% of games
4.5
35.7%
10W–18L · 43.2% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#2 Male Doubles
23%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#1 Male Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert