← Search

James Axford

Glenmont, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
303 matches · 167W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Axford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history303 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Bologna 8.0 Men’s 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Bologna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Matt Picardi / Louis Pierro
2026-08-18 · Bologna 8.0 Men’s 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-17 · I Think I'm Going Bald · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Brent Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-11 · Bologna 8.0 Men’s 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Thomas Begley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Hanley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
69.4%
50W–22L · 56.8% of games
4.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.5% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 57.3% of games
8.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 61.5% of games
9.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 65.4% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
69.6%
39W–17L · 56% of games
9.0mixed
35.7%
10W–18L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
159 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
95 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
47 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe