← Search

Marc Hann

— year-end
50 matches · 22W–28L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Marc Hann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Syracuse: syracusetweeners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mizuho Okada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · Syracuse: syracusetweeners · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Ingraham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-31 · Syracuse: syracusetweeners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Jansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-15 · #1 Male Doubles · with William Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · 40-LOVE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony Farella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-04 · Drumlins B · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Stephen Nesspor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-18 · Drumlins B · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Shay Smyth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · 40-LOVE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bong Gee Jang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-24 · 40-LOVE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Nicholls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Josh Gingrich / Keith Stanley
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · with Kyle Voyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-01-04 · #3 Doubles · with Kyle Voyer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · Eastern/Bradley/4.5M Tri Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael DeLaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
50%
5W–5L · 55.3% of games
3.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.8% of games
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.7% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 28.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
5 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova