← Search

Peggy Jaques

— year-end
22 matches · 6W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peggy Jaques to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
W
2026-03-26 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-4
L
2026-03-19 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-12 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kaki Brenneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-03-21 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-13 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Grewe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-02-15 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-01-25 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-03-21 · MAC-Milan/Fernando · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peg McClendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-10-15 · MAC-Leedy/Jones · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Leedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-09-24 · MAC-Leedy/Jones · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-23 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Bachhuber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-06-10 · MAC-Leedy/Davis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams10 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.6% of games
7.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 41% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King