← Search

Caitlin Bower

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 64W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Caitlin Bower to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
W
2026-09-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Molly Otter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Emerson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dave Agler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · MSA (Mas Serve Aces) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mike Cooley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · Shot Show 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tannan Koehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-08 · Shot Show 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Nice Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-05 · Shot Show 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Schafer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
12W–0L · 74.1% of games
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 72% of games
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 58.4% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.7% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 71% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Singles
25%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert