← Search

Molly Schafer

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 87W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Molly Schafer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Otter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jule Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jule Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Nice Hits 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Shot Show 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlin Bower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · Nice Hits 18+ · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · Nice Hits 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · Shot Show 18s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Vaughan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Nice Hits 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · Shot Show 18s · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karri Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · Nice Hits 18+ · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-12 · Shot Show 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Mosher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.9%
51W–22L · 60.9% of games
4.0
34.4%
21W–40L · 43.8% of games
6.5mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.8% of games
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams