← Search

Lina Zenner

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 34W–25L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lina Zenner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Netflirts · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7
W
2026-08-11 · Mixed Trouble · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Willam Scoggin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Play It Forward · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Play It Forward · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Shansby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · Play It Forward · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawna Ianson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · Hillcrest 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hillary Lilya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · HCC Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-07 · Hillcrest 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hillary Lilya
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · HCC Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · HCC Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-30 · Hillcrest 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margo Showers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-04-29 · HCC Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65%
26W–14L · 56.9% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.3% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova