← Search

Edward Conway

Landisville, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 63W–62L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Edward Conway to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-09-13 · RCW - Ankeny · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shannon Etzweiler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-15 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Trimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-18 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Trimmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2025-10-03 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Kitsock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-19 · RCW - Zink · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dale Beshore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
Robert Franklin / Mickey Brown
2025-09-07 · #4 Doubles · with Kirk Thoman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
Tom Sellig / Peter Seneca
2025-09-05 · #4 Doubles · with Victor Fissella championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Jeffrey Pham / Canh Ho
2025-09-05 · #4 Doubles · with Kirk Thoman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-10 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victor Fissella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-07-27 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victor Fissella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-03-29 · Hempfield - Pipkin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gretchen Walden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 49% of games
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 49.2% of games
9.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
75%
36W–12L · 56.7% of games
9.0mixed
25%
6W–18L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe