← Search

Benjamin Smith

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 32W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Benjamin Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2026-08-12 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Staman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Schrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · Messiah University - Bischof · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Bischof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-12-13 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hugo VanderGoes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-12-07 · Hempfield - Strange / Westheaffer · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abby Aukamp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-12-06 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Staman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-21 · Hempfield - Strange / Westheaffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madonna Hufnagel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-21 · Hempfield - Strange / Westheaffer · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Madonna Hufnagel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-01 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bernard Ilkhanoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-18 · Hempfield - Strange / Westheaffer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Loose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-10-18 · Hempfield - Baumer Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Kirchner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · RCW Loose · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Steve Staman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 53% of games
4.0
48%
12W–13L · 53.9% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 36.4% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer