← Search

Jon Rubinstein

— year-end
344 matches · 212W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jon Rubinstein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history344 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Emmanuel Sobong championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Francois Vernet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Andreas Landgrebe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecilia Orchard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-4
L
Michael Craparo / Andrew Hoffman
2026-06-24 · NJ: Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vladimir Bojcev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brigette Elaina Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · NJD/NJ Smash · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harrison Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alison North mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
Andrew Hoffman / Jason Bilanin
2026-06-10 · NJ: Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harish Kumar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · with Cecilia Orchard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Andrew Hoffman / Serban Satruc
2026-06-03 · NJ: Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with ILAN GAMBURG
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-01 · NJ: Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harrison Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
60.4%
90W–59L · 54.1% of games
5.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
76.9%
90W–27L · 58.2% of games
9.0mixed
37%
10W–17L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
177 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
74 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert