← Search

Bridget Smithmier

Leawood, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 41W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bridget Smithmier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deann Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Jensen, Jacqui · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nora Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deann Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-12-14 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-12-07 · Jensen, Jacqui · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Leek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-11-23 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Hedrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-10-12 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Leek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-09-14 · Jensen, Jacqui · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Leek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
54.7%
29W–24L · 51.7% of games
4.0
8.3%
2W–22L · 35% of games
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
29 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams