← Search

Susie Hartzog

— year-end
31 matches · 15W–16L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Susie Hartzog to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-06-23 · Bainbridge/Coyle · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Becca Harville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
Tammy Griffin / Amy Thomas
2026-06-16 · Bainbridge/Coyle · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Webb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2
L
2026-06-02 · Bainbridge/Coyle · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deborah Wilkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Bainbridge/Coyle · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deborah Wilkey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-14 · Bainbridge/Powell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
Layne Cox / Joan Lake
2026-03-28 · Bainbridge/Powell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Overman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · Bainbridge/Powell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-07 · Bainbridge/Powell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-08 · Flint River/Carson Parker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-04-14 · Bainbridge/Edgar · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Babs Coyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-29 · Bainbridge/Edgar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-12 · Bainbridge/Edgar · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karan Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.2% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 60.9% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer