← Search

Tricia Szwarc

— year-end
58 matches · 47W–11L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tricia Szwarc to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2025-10-18 · Thomasville/Parker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-13 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
Gina Herring / Elizabeth Murray
2025-10-11 · Stratton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oriane Yvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-04 · Thomasville/Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-09-28 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Thriffiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-09-22 · Herring · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sherry Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-14 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-07 · Thomasville/Thriffiley · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Franson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2025-09-06 · Thomasville/Parker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Rudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-08-23 · Thomasville/Saunders · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carson Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
L
2025-08-23 · Thomasville/Saunders · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carson Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
W
2025-07-15 · Herring · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams32 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
88%
22W–3L · 68% of games
4.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.9% of games
7.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 68.6% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams