← Search

Christine Clements

Evansville, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 48W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine Clements to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-07-30 · Manz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Manz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raibley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Caitlyn Blandford / MAKO HOSOKAWA
2026-06-11 · Manz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · Manz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raibley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · KY/OWB/WALTHER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raibley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-14 · KY/OWB/WALTHER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-03-14 · KY/OWB/WALTHER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Raibley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Jaimie Humbert / Donna Schroering
2025-10-08 · Osborn - Evv Fall 7.5 Womens Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Clark
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-01 · Osborn - Evv Fall 7.5 Womens Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Micah Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-10 · Osborn - Evv Fall 7.5 Womens Combo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Micah Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Hahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Sally Osborn / Jaimie Humbert
2025-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Manz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
73.5%
36W–13L · 60.9% of games
7.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 55.3% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer