← Search

MAKO HOSOKAWA

— year-end
198 matches · 128W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add MAKO HOSOKAWA to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
W
2026-07-28 · Conrad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Newland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Lindsey Finke / Katherine Jones
2026-07-14 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Markwell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Scheessele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
Kendra Wilke / Micah Lee
2026-07-07 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Poynter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · Markwell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Scheessele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · Conrad · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandy Stabenfeldt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Markwell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlyn Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Newland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Markwell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caitlyn Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Lindsey Finke / Stephanie Moll
2026-06-09 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Newland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Donna Schroering / Mary Beth Ozete
2026-06-02 · Conrad · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Quehl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · Markwell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Scheessele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.5%
88W–35L · 60.1% of games
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 46.9% of games
7.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
48 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams