← Search

Daniel May

— year-end
23 matches · 9W–14L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Daniel May to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2024-12-18 · Team Schere · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ray Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2024-12-11 · Team Schere · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ray Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-11-05 · Team Mekles · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Michael Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-10-29 · Team Mekles/Rubinstein · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrew Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2022-06-28 · NJ: Songbirds · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-05-24 · NJ: Songbirds · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Iwanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2021-10-09 · #3 Doubles · with Christopher Chan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-10-09 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Chan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2021-07-27 · NJ: Team Kaplan · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-07-22 · NJ: Team Kaplan · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-07-15 · NJ: Team Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Leary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2021-07-02 · NJ: Team Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Iwanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams7 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 50% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
2 matches
#2 Singles
9%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova