← Search

Brian Leary

Maplewood, NJ
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 16W–11L · seasons 2021–2024

Captains: add Brian Leary to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2024-07-15 · Kaplan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ray Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-06-17 · Kaplan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Burger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-06 · Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-05-23 · Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-02-25 · Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Rim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-5
W
2024-02-04 · Mixed Nuts · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ingrid Floyd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-01-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jon Rubinstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2023-11-19 · NJ: Team Cisco · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-11-12 · NJ: Team Cisco · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Khalev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-11-11 · Team Globerman · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Andrew Song
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2023-07-20 · NJ: Kaplan · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Mekles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2023-07-10 · NJ: Kaplan · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 53.7% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#2 Singles
19%
5 matches
#1 Singles
15%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer