← Search

Alyssn Lott

Indianola, MS
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 12W–11L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Alyssn Lott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Lott-ICC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Lott-ICC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Hazlewood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · Adams ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · Adams ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elyette Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-04-18 · Simmons-ICC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Pillow Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-27 · Simmons-ICC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-09-25 · Neal - ICC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Barner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-09-11 · Neal - ICC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Barner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-08-25 · Neal - ICC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Betsy Belk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-07-25 · Neal - ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-07-17 · Neal - ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Pillow Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-06-18 · Neal - ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 60% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#1 Singles
13%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
4%
1 match
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams