← Search

Emmy Millwood

Cleveland, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 33W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emmy Millwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Aylward-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Meredith Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Aylward-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Aylward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
Misty Moseley / Rhonda Allen
2025-09-29 · Boykin-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mari Micci Bramuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-25 · Boykin-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mari Micci Bramuchi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-08-21 · Morgan-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-08-10 · Taylor-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Beth Joel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-05 · Taylor-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Naomi Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-07-16 · Taylor/Jennings-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Millwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-29 · Taylor/Jennings-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Millwood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 59.4% of games
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 56% of games
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.7% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 44.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#1 Singles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams