← Search

Leah Barner

— year-end
32 matches · 21W–11L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Leah Barner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-04-22 · Simmons-ICC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Chenault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-29 · Neal - ICC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Toler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2024-09-26 · Darden-ICC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2024-09-25 · Neal - ICC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alyssn Lott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-09-24 · Darden-ICC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-09-11 · Neal - ICC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alyssn Lott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-09-08 · Neal - ICC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-07-25 · Neal - ICC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Robin Toler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-07-21 · Neal - ICC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hannah Farmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-05-16 · Simmons-ICC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Pillow Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2024-04-22 · Simmons-ICC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-16 · Toler-ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 58% of games
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 58.8% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe