← Search

Tanya Tomao

Robbinsville, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
207 matches · 85W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tanya Tomao to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history207 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Kathleen Francioso championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · Team Kuszelewicz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chari McClary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · Diff'rent Strokes · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1
L
2026-06-17 · Dangerous Divas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-5
W
2026-06-16 · Diff'rent Strokes · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-12 · 2 Bucks & Beyond · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Wasserman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-02 · Diff'rent Strokes · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kelly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Monmouth: Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-29 · Team Kuszelewicz · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · Dangerous Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · Diff'rent Strokes · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-19 · Diff'rent Strokes · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathleen Francioso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 48.8% of games
3.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 66% of games
4.0
36.2%
55W–97L · 46.9% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 25.3% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova