← Search

Linda Benson

— year-end
46 matches · 15W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Linda Benson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-04-04 · Belmont Sherdel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-21 · 9 MAC Team MAC Attack - Bates · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Evan Dodd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-01 · 9 MAC Team MAC Attack - Bates · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Temple mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7
W
2026-01-24 · 9 MAC Team MAC Attack - Bates · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amadeus Malheiros mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-06 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lawrence Golixer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-10-26 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michael Gitomirski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-19 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michael Gitomirski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · MAC - Haynes 5.5 combo mix · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michael Gitomirski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-09-13 · Belmont Sherdel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judith McGarrity
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-06-14 · Belmont Bouncers Bates · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diana Plasberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-15 · MAC Merry Makers Bates 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Bates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2025-05-10 · Belmont Bouncers Bates · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 53% of games
3.5
0%
0W–11L · 27.1% of games
6.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.4% of games
6.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.8% of games
5.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova