← Search

Pamela Jones

— year-end
92 matches · 36W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pamela Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Glen Creek - Unfinished Business · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Beighey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ingrid Meenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · Glen Creek Vipers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Locher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · Glen Creek GRIT · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Kness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Glen Creek GRIT · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Smelko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · Glen Creek GRIT · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Smelko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · Glen Creek GRIT · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Virginia Barnicoat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · Glen Creek Vipers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-10 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · South Hills Hot Enuf · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ingrid Meenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 37.3% of games
4.0
36.4%
16W–28L · 45.7% of games
8.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer