← Search

Rajeeta Bazaz

— year-end
110 matches · 79W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rajeeta Bazaz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Lakevue Ladies · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Pallaki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · Highland Park · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Melissa King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · Highland Park · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ann Graff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · Lakevue Ladies · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jacquelyn Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · Brady Bunch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Wagner-Knott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Highland Park · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kirsten Rydstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Brady Bunch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Wagner-Knott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · Brady Bunch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Digiacomo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-19 · Brady Bunch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Wagner-Knott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Highland Park · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melissa King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · Lakevue Ladies · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Zickar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Highland Park · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lori Baran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
60%
12W–8L · 52.1% of games
4.5
71.4%
25W–10L · 57.4% of games
8.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 60.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer