← Search

Craig Brehmer

Fuquay Varina, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 56W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Craig Brehmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-09-13 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eli Jerchower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Hankinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · TOC.Merck · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eli Jerchower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Toman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hans Norland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-18 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victor Talbird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Hungarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-02 · TOC.Merck · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · TOC.Merck · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · TOC.Merck · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-07 · TOC.Merck · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Hankinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
78.8%
26W–7L · 60.4% of games
4.0
35%
7W–13L · 42.7% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.2% of games
7.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal