← Search

Victor Talbird

CARY, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 103W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victor Talbird to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
L
2026-09-12 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matt Hankinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layton Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layton Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-25 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristofer Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Mark Scherr / Andrew Pham
2026-06-03 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Layton Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Hungarter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-06 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristofer Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristofer Merck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
William Adams / Brian Baron
2026-04-26 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pedro Torrejon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-19 · TOC.Merck · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 67.7% of games
4.0
40%
42W–63L · 46.2% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
37.5%
18W–30L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
48 matches
#1 Singles
18%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
29 matches
#2 Singles
12%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King