← Search

Matt Hankinson

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 53W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Matt Hankinson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-09-12 · TOC.Merck · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Victor Talbird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Layton Barker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Craig Brehmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-22 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Jabusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-15 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-17 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Zelano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dominic Caristo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-06 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eli Jerchower
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · TOC.Merck · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Brehmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
Will Sendall / Tom Tuning
2025-10-05 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Victor Talbird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-02 · TOC.Merck · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Haithcock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.7% of games
4.0
42.3%
33W–45L · 47.6% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
34.9%
15W–28L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#2 Singles
8%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe