← Search

Nathan Immekus

Troy, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 24W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nathan Immekus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-07-20 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erik Ronmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · BHC-Uhlar 40s 4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Newman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Jason Chen / Sam Healy
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · with Xiaoqiang Li championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
James Lang / Joseph Dembowski
2025-12-06 · 2BEV- Uhlar 85 COMBO MEN F · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Xiaoqiang Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-19 · 2BEV- Uhlar 85 COMBO MEN F · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Xiaoqiang Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-11 · 2BEV- Uhlar 85 COMBO MEN F · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Xiaoqiang Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
Brian Roberts / Eric Shaw
2025-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Jonathan Rhind championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Haines championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
N/A
2025-07-22 · 5BT-ROSEN 40M TU 18&O SEM F4 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-16 · 4BEV-UHLAR 45M WE 18&O SEM F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carter Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
James Lang / Sam Healy
2025-07-14 · 1BEV-UHLAR 45M MO 40&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nikhil Bahadur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 72.3% of games
4.5
33.3%
11W–22L · 47.3% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer