← Search

Eric Shaw

Ann Arbor, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
225 matches · 121W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eric Shaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
W
2026-08-19 · CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susi Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kaylee Tucker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · CHIP-Douglass 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susi Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
AJAY SAI VEERAPANENI / Hussain Vohra
2026-08-08 · #4 Doubles · with Jonathan Bowdler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
William Bell / Madeline Slade
2026-08-04 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susi Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
Max Downey / Timothy Throgmorton
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Rhodes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Rohan Nair / Brian Miller
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Christopher Peikert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Brian Kean / Michael Coleman
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Bebiak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Cooper mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · RCAA-Shaw 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Rhodes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-10 · RCAA-Tucker 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Bambini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · HV-Brewer 40s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
54.5%
54W–45L · 53.2% of games
8.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.8% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
24W–24L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
48 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams