← Search

Jo Anne Raffa

Halfmoon, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 56W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jo Anne Raffa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
L
2026-08-19 · 6.0W55 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · 6.0W55 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · 6.0W55 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Rossi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-01 · 6.0W55 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shari Whiting
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-19 · 6.0W65 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Moran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · 6.0W65 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Catherine Herman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-19 · 7.0mxd40 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin O'Connor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · Northern: 6.0mxd40 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with James Davies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · Northern: 6.0mxd40 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Peter Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-14 · Northern: 6.0mxd40 Raffa · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeffrey Klamka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
Sharon Cook / Loretta Brennan
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · with Rose Fennessey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Beverly Swimm championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.1% of games
6.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.7% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
65.5%
19W–10L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 83% of the time
#3 Doubles
83%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova