← Search

Deborah Siegel

Bloomfield Hills, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 56W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-07-27 · EAST-Schulte 55 9.0 NW · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Barbara Friesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Lankowsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Antonia Burkhard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · EAST-Schulte 55 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julie Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madoka Minamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Enright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · OHCC-Keranen 40s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Enright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-17 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Spellman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · EAST-Schulte 55 9.0 NW · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marcia Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · SCWB-Hack 55s 8.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Pozolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81%
17W–4L · 59.6% of games
4.5
27.5%
11W–29L · 39.9% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.7% of games
9.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 45.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#1 Singles
17%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal