← Search

Therese Jones

— year-end
210 matches · 88W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Therese Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history210 matches
L
2026-05-16 · MAC Scott · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Riester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · MAC Scott · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · MAC Scott · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susanne Nazur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Michael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · MAC Greenspoon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Talamo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · Bon Air 7.5 Snow Morris · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ken Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
Fahim Rahman / Jennifer Shaffer
2025-11-05 · Bon Air 7.5 Snow Morris · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ken Hammond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
Charo Aguilar / Beth Anderson
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · with Ashley Hart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-23 · MAC Greenspoon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kasey Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
Elizabeth Martin / Kerry DeLacey
2025-08-11 · Belmont - Colgin 55+ Weeknight · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ashley Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-08-09 · MAC Greenspoon · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Messmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-14 · Belmont - Colgin 55+ Weeknight · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Shannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.5% of games
4.0
40%
28W–42L · 46.7% of games
7.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 45.2% of games
8.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 47.7% of games
7.5mixed
30.4%
7W–16L · 39.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
18W–18L · 46.9% of games
8.5mixed
25%
3W–9L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
55 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova