← Search

Kim Michael

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 127W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Michael to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Malheiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Malheiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
W
2026-08-22 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Malheiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · MAC Greenspoon · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Messmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Jepson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Malheiros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · MAC Greenspoon · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · MAC Greenspoon · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · MAC Scott · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Therese Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · MAC Scott · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Riester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · MAC Greenspoon · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Therese Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 55.4% of games
4.0
51.8%
44W–41L · 50.5% of games
7.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 51.9% of games
8.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.4% of games
7.0mixed
44.7%
17W–21L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
54.1%
20W–17L · 49.9% of games
8.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
67 matches
#1 Singles
7%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer