← Search

Kelly Horna

— year-end
76 matches · 40W–36L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kelly Horna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Ossman/Warrick/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kelly Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Monajjem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Laura Wilson / Ryan Reeve
2026-07-28 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Goodwyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · Ossman/Doty/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-25 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Lund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · Ossman/Doty/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacqueline King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · Ossman/Fitzgerald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maura Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Ossman/Fitzgerald/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Lund/Murfreesboro · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt McCord mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Kelley/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joy Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · Blankenship/Murfreesboro · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Hicks/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Monajjem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams45 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
53.2%
25W–22L · 50.4% of games
4.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.7% of games
7.5
80%
8W–2L · 59.3% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova