← Search

Sarah Larocco

— year-end
71 matches · 30W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Larocco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-07 · NJD/The Fox Den · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-16 · NJD/The Fox Den · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee McNellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-19 · NJD/The Fox Den · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee McNellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-05 · NJD/The Fox Den · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Tavani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Cindy Rohrbaugh / Sharon Williams
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · with Renee McNellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-08-26 · NATIONAL/The Fox Den · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee McNellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-06-17 · NATIONAL/The Fox Den · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee McNellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-03 · NATIONAL/The Fox Den · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Renee McNellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
Susan Levy / Sharon Martinez
2025-01-25 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Dennison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-08-27 · NATIONAL/The Fox Den · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheryl Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Keeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Greimel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 45.6% of games
4.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 45.3% of games
7.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.1% of games
8.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 34% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova