← Search

Elizabeth Zuckerman

Princeton, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 30W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Zuckerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-05-20 · High Strung · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-5
L
2026-05-19 · PRC Fab Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Franz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-12 · PRC Fab Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lucia Marchetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Rowan Watson / Katie Johnson
2026-05-06 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Wijesinghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-29 · High Strung · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-08-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Carusone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-4
W
2025-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Leighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Carusone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-4
L
2025-08-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Leighton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Carusone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-07-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50.9%
28W–27L · 47.5% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#1 Singles
28%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams