← Search

Karen Donahue

— year-end
119 matches · 84W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Donahue to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-07-07 · PRC Fab Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · PRC Fab Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · SHORE/Act Your Age · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meegan Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · PRC Fab Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · Great Dames · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-29 · SHORE/Act Your Age · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meegan Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Great Dames · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · Game Changers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · Game Changers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-13 · Game Changers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tami Sasala
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-06 · Game Changers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lasher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-21 · WILDCARD/Game Changers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 64.4% of games
3.0
80%
28W–7L · 67.2% of games
3.5
68%
34W–16L · 56% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 87.3% of games
7.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 55.4% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer