← Search

Tricia Reeks

— year-end
33 matches · 17W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tricia Reeks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
W
2026-09-09 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Salter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dorothy Singhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Josie Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Meacham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dorothy Singhal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Sallie LaChance / Lisa Young
2026-08-13 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-30 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Pryately
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Pryately
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · WNCJ Sweezey (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.2% of games
4.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 40.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
9W–0L · 66.3% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova