← Search

Sharlyn Aamodt

— year-end
58 matches · 29W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sharlyn Aamodt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
Nicole Ingle / Amanda Nichols
2026-09-09 · WNCJ Hudgens (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Zehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · WNCJ Hudgens (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jessica Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · WNCJ Hudgens (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Zehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Tricia Lancor / Susan Watson
2026-08-03 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-16 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-07 · WNCJ Hudgens (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Hare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Rardin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · WNCJ Hudgens (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hudgens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-20 · WNCK Peeples (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaitlyn Peeples Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-15 · WNCC Mohammed (HRC) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams67 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
61.3%
19W–12L · 54.3% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 39.5% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.2% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
16 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King