Sallie LaChance
Marion, NC
338 matches · 183W–155L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Sallie LaChance to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history338 matches
W
Julie Wilson / Carissa Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Sharlyn Aamodt / Jessica Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Mindy Bolick / Jennifer Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2020–2026
Collins-Schweitzer/PC/Foothills
Collins/PC/Foothills
Tonks/PC/Foothills
Tonks/PC/Foothills
Tonks/PC/Foothills
Tonks/PC/Foothills
WNCA Rardin (Aston Park)
WNCC Mohammed (HRC)
WNCC Mohammed (HRC)
WNCC Mohammed (HRC)
WNCC Mohammed (HRC)
WNCC Mohammed (HRC)
WNCD West (HRC)
WNCK Peeples (HRC)
WNCS Lachance (HRC)
WNCT Walker (Aston Park)
WNCV Massey (Aston Park)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 59.5% of games
3.5
65.1%
56W–30L · 58.7% of games
4.0
36.8%
35W–60L · 46.5% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.8% of games
7.5
50%
23W–23L · 52.2% of games
8.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 55.4% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 74.6% of games
7.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
48 matches
#1 Singles
11%
38 matches
#2 Singles
4%
14 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.