← Search

James Oderkirk

West Bloomfield, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 82W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Oderkirk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-03-21 · FAC-Roberts MEN MED TRI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Stieber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-07 · FAC-Roberts MEN MED TRI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Stieber
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Aikin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · FAC-Roberts MEN MED TRI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Ross
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-14 · Midwest/Stieber/55&O/7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Birgit Sorgenfrei mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-16 · Midwest/Stieber/55&O/7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Hodges mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-11-02 · 4FAC-Lau 8.0 X 55&0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Bandol mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-26 · Midwest/Stieber/55&O/7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kendra Theriot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-19 · 4FAC-Lau 8.0 X 55&0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Lau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-05 · 4FAC-Lau 8.0 X 55&0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Lau mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
Jay Nickels / Joseph Kohley
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with David Proefke championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-13 · 1FAC-ROSS 80M WE 55&O SEM · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Cupples
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 58.6% of games
4.0
17.4%
4W–19L · 36.2% of games
7.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.3% of games
8.0
0%
0W–9L · 28.6% of games
6.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
48 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert