← Search

Deanna Allard

Venice, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 122W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deanna Allard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-06-15 · PP Evening Narwhals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · PP Evening Narwhals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · PP Evening Narwhals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Shay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-20 · PP Evening Narwhals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison McCarthy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
Xiao Zhang / Tish Wissel
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · with Barbara Belanger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-08 · Mooney Mission · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
60.7%
71W–46L · 54.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
8.0
61.9%
39W–24L · 56.1% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.8% of games
9.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.7% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
61 matches
#1 Singles
20%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
26 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer