← Search

Catherine Fallin

RICHMOND, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
290 matches · 125W–165L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Fallin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history290 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Gromling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Harmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · Raintree-Fallin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Gromling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · 11 Raintree Evans · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Riedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · 11 Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Riedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
L
2026-07-08 · 11 Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Riedel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · 11 Raintree Evans · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine McGehee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.2% of games
4.0
43.8%
42W–54L · 48.7% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 53.7% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.7% of games
8.0
38.6%
22W–35L · 44.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.8% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.6%
20W–27L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
112 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
54 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova